Comment by brainwad
5 days ago
> No "Suchmaschine" + no „Suchbefehl“ -> no "Tatbestand"
I think you have misapprehended the ruling. Of course running an LLM that spits out libel is also a crime outside of search engines. It's just that _this_ crime has those elements. If Meta's LLM defamed a business, then the ruling would instead talk about Whatsapp users and chats, or whatever.
I think you are misapprehending the ruling.
I someone would put the libellous statement into Google Translate in English and the LLM spits out the German translation would that be a crime from Google?
My point is exactly that the court has not decided more than it has decided: If it is a search in a search engine it is a crime.