← Back to context Comment by dgellow 4 hours ago Could we fix the title to match the article?> How we helped Bunq secure their financial AI assistant 2 comments dgellow Reply gpvos 4 hours ago I think the current title, while admittedly a bit clickbaity, describes the core issue better. dgellow 4 hours ago Fair enough, my point is mostly that it doesn’t follow the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.The current one is editorialized and clickbait-ish
gpvos 4 hours ago I think the current title, while admittedly a bit clickbaity, describes the core issue better. dgellow 4 hours ago Fair enough, my point is mostly that it doesn’t follow the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.The current one is editorialized and clickbait-ish
dgellow 4 hours ago Fair enough, my point is mostly that it doesn’t follow the HN guidelines:> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.The current one is editorialized and clickbait-ish
I think the current title, while admittedly a bit clickbaity, describes the core issue better.
Fair enough, my point is mostly that it doesn’t follow the HN guidelines:
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
The current one is editorialized and clickbait-ish