Comment by tyre
4 days ago
They were reviewing perf designations, then pulling up PR count, then arguing against designation based on the number of PRs opened.
4 days ago
They were reviewing perf designations, then pulling up PR count, then arguing against designation based on the number of PRs opened.
That still doesn't clarify: were they saying "many PRs→good" or "many PRs→bad" or "number of PRs is irrelevant" or...?
That PRs == impact.
Wait, PRs opened? Wouldn't merged make more sense?