← Back to context

Comment by acdha

4 days ago

Also the merits of documentation and specs. It’s been eye-opening to see the subset of developers who were almost disdainful about writing documentation for their colleagues but are now tripping over themselves to do so for their clanker.

Agents read the docs. People don't. That's the underlying reason.

  • > People don't.

    People falling all over themselves to write docs for their pile-of-linear-algebra-with-a-smiley-face-painted-on-it [0] don't read the docs, no. People who give a shit about writing solid software that doesn't get them paged at three in the damn morning do.

    [0] The face is there to provide social-trustworthiness signals to engage the human pack-bonding instinct, natch.

    • Your sarcasm is unwarranted, because what I said is true and reflects the experience of a lot of people.

      A decade ago I left a job and spent the last week thoroughly documenting every flow and code section of an app that I worked with, which was the core value proposition of the company. A couple years later I ask around and nobody even took a look at that.

      People just don't read, and there are actually good reasons for that, one of them being that documentation is outdated in most orgs and the effort to keep it up to date is greater than reading the code.

      2 replies →

[flagged]

  • That’s a rather stunning comparison: racism is a problem because it’s unfairly treating sentient beings but a pile of linear algebra is not even sentient, much less your peer. That’s part of why I used the term: “agent” isn’t current because agents have, well, agency and can be held accountable.

    https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/5/26/clankers/

  • Positing an equivalence between a dismissive term for AI bots and a racial slur against black people is, like, super racist.