← Back to context Comment by tombert 3 days ago I mentioned this specifically in my comment :) 7 comments tombert Reply stdbrouw 2 days ago ... yet you still conclude "AI translation has gotten so good", so which is it? tombert 2 days ago I do think it's gotten pretty good. I'm just acknowledging my limitations in the matter. It's not a contradiction. deno 14 hours ago You acknowledge your test is fundamentally flawed but then still use it for the basis of your conclusion. It’s worse not better that you were aware of this. oytis 2 days ago Try translating some prose from English to another language, then, in a different model, back to English 2 replies → sushid 2 days ago I'm sorry but it's just such a glaring caveat. And the fact that you don't speak French...
stdbrouw 2 days ago ... yet you still conclude "AI translation has gotten so good", so which is it? tombert 2 days ago I do think it's gotten pretty good. I'm just acknowledging my limitations in the matter. It's not a contradiction. deno 14 hours ago You acknowledge your test is fundamentally flawed but then still use it for the basis of your conclusion. It’s worse not better that you were aware of this. oytis 2 days ago Try translating some prose from English to another language, then, in a different model, back to English 2 replies → sushid 2 days ago I'm sorry but it's just such a glaring caveat. And the fact that you don't speak French...
tombert 2 days ago I do think it's gotten pretty good. I'm just acknowledging my limitations in the matter. It's not a contradiction. deno 14 hours ago You acknowledge your test is fundamentally flawed but then still use it for the basis of your conclusion. It’s worse not better that you were aware of this. oytis 2 days ago Try translating some prose from English to another language, then, in a different model, back to English 2 replies → sushid 2 days ago I'm sorry but it's just such a glaring caveat. And the fact that you don't speak French...
deno 14 hours ago You acknowledge your test is fundamentally flawed but then still use it for the basis of your conclusion. It’s worse not better that you were aware of this.
oytis 2 days ago Try translating some prose from English to another language, then, in a different model, back to English 2 replies →
sushid 2 days ago I'm sorry but it's just such a glaring caveat. And the fact that you don't speak French...
... yet you still conclude "AI translation has gotten so good", so which is it?
I do think it's gotten pretty good. I'm just acknowledging my limitations in the matter. It's not a contradiction.
You acknowledge your test is fundamentally flawed but then still use it for the basis of your conclusion. It’s worse not better that you were aware of this.
Try translating some prose from English to another language, then, in a different model, back to English
2 replies →
I'm sorry but it's just such a glaring caveat. And the fact that you don't speak French...