Guess I have no way of proving it, but I pinky swear that I didn't edit it in later!
But yeah, I broadly do agree; if I read other languages I could find a book that hadn't been thoroughly translated to English and then I could give a proper analysis on how good the translation is, but since I'm a very stereotypical American I know exactly one language (and sometimes my comprehension of even that is questionable).
> I could find a book that hadn't been thoroughly translated to English and then I could give a proper analysis on how good the translation is, but since I'm a very stereotypical American I know exactly one language
I feel like that wasn’t there when I started writing my comment. I also have a bad habit of quickly posting and then adding over a few minutes.
Glad we agree :)
Guess I have no way of proving it, but I pinky swear that I didn't edit it in later!
But yeah, I broadly do agree; if I read other languages I could find a book that hadn't been thoroughly translated to English and then I could give a proper analysis on how good the translation is, but since I'm a very stereotypical American I know exactly one language (and sometimes my comprehension of even that is questionable).
> I could find a book that hadn't been thoroughly translated to English and then I could give a proper analysis on how good the translation is, but since I'm a very stereotypical American I know exactly one language
So you actually cannot give a proper analysis.
Welcome to the internet