← Back to context

Comment by vlovich123

1 day ago

Believe it or not, mathematical techniques and computational power have increased in the past hundreds of years, not to mention the digitization of everything.

Privacy issues that weren’t possible before due to cost are now pennies to exploit. Also keep in mind as it points out people were using census data to drive gerrymandering efforts, so these attacks are real and have been going on for a long time.

I don’t understand why gerrymandering would require privacy violation, or how differential privacy would stop it.

  • Gerrymandering is most effective when you know exact voting patterns of each household so you can draw the lines to get the result you want. Differential privacy blurs those boundaries and provides more room for the partisan hacks to make a fatal mistake.

    • Sounds very unlikely in practice. Any evidence anyone actually tried to deanonymize this data for this purpose?