← Back to context Comment by stasomatic 1 day ago It has an unfortunate name though, maybe a short shelf life. Rust++ doesn’t seem inviting either. 6 comments stasomatic Reply steveklabnik 1 day ago Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense. stasomatic 1 day ago Not yet. kibwen 1 day ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 3 replies →
steveklabnik 1 day ago Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense. stasomatic 1 day ago Not yet. kibwen 1 day ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 3 replies →
stasomatic 1 day ago Not yet. kibwen 1 day ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 3 replies →
kibwen 1 day ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 3 replies →
Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense.
Not yet.
I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices.
3 replies →