← Back to context Comment by stasomatic 6 days ago It has an unfortunate name though, maybe a short shelf life. Rust++ doesn’t seem inviting either. 8 comments stasomatic Reply steveklabnik 6 days ago Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense. stasomatic 5 days ago Not yet. kibwen 5 days ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 5 replies →
steveklabnik 6 days ago Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense. stasomatic 5 days ago Not yet. kibwen 5 days ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 5 replies →
stasomatic 5 days ago Not yet. kibwen 5 days ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 5 replies →
kibwen 5 days ago I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices. 5 replies →
Rust does not have a ++ operator, so that name would make no sense.
Not yet.
I can assure you that Rust will never have a ++ operator. Not only is it semantically bizarre, it's entirely unnecessary in a language where iteration is overwhelmingly performed via iterators rather than via manually incrementing array indices.
5 replies →