← Back to context

Comment by nxobject

21 hours ago

> The comments that this rather expensive endeavour should just be about getting a head count are also amusing to me. The data collected was such an important baseline of common understanding, and this will not be a good thing for its future quality.

Even without considering the Census data products alone, Census demographic data underlies virtually all extrapolation from other survey research. Everything from national opinion surveys based on tens of thousands of respondents, to small community surveys. A Census product with the most diverse participation pays off almost infinitely for America. It benefits everyone from national newspapers to rural counties.

If the smallest communities lose what little trust remains in the privacy of the Census, they have the most to lose in all of these ways.

Hey buddy, did you say diverse?

That’s a badthink now. Please retract.

(And I mean this literally: using this word has gotten scientific grants cancelled by our Snowflakes in Chief, e.g. in studying biodiversity)

  • We have a screwworm infestation now because the Idiot In Chief sawthe previous control method had transgenic flies.