Comment by sudonem
21 hours ago
I would be interested in knowing both what kind of fabrication occurred, but perhaps I’m not curious about how it was discovered?
Did the defense use some sort of tool to debunk? Was it just an obvious deepfake etc? Or was it the officer’s ineptitude that got him caught?
Probably simply a case of "show me a picture of X with their fingers in the cookie jar".
My experiece with whatsapp family groups is that a lot of people over 40 can't detect the most obvious AI fakes (e.g. Studio Gibli clones, or three handed people), so they share the most stupid stuff as it was real, while youngers seem have an instinct to detect AI but can't tell exactly why they know.
I can picture a cop fabricating images that are obvious, even with a watermark included, while totally convinced that it is undetectable.
IME it’s more like 60, which then makes more sense given vision deterioration. Then again most of my over-40 experience is with folks in the tech industry.
The ai slop uses movie compositions in whats supossed to be handheld shots?
I like using professional cameras and lighting for casual photos, I guess everyone now assumes it’s AI.
Which makes sense but still, ffs.