So, anyone who had owned a plot of land was at least deserving of property rights - but given that lots of people's in the 20th century were unfairly stripped of their property rights and never compensated, I wouldn't expect anything.
As they did not possess sovereignty in the region, I don't recognize any sort of collective national claim of ownership to the overall region.
So, anyone who had owned a plot of land was at least deserving of property rights - but given that lots of people's in the 20th century were unfairly stripped of their property rights and never compensated, I wouldn't expect anything.
As they did not possess sovereignty in the region, I don't recognize any sort of collective national claim of ownership to the overall region.