Comment by zetalyrae
20 hours ago
> This is a very good essay when you get past the arrogant tone evident especially at the beginning (is that a form of engagement bait?…)
We have reached the point where you have college professors who defend[0] using AI to write scientific papers (in a seemingly AI-written tweet). Everywhere I go online, I see spam written with the exact same voice. Scientific journals and literary magazines are inundated with AI-written submissions. Software projects have shut contributions because maintainers are tired of reading AI-written slop pull requests.
What's the right tone to take here? "Please stop defecting"? "I wish you would kindly stop ruining the commons"? I don't know. Maybe, if we raise the reputational cost of slop, we get less of it.
Perhaps I meant ‘crude’ rather than ‘arrogant’. Or another word that a blend of the two.
I mean, I think there’s a middle ground between defending all uses of AI writing and saying “It’s like making yourself into a eunuch so Claude can fuck your wife.”
Edit: or “if you use AI to write, you are a waste of biomass”
Maybe you're right.