Comment by theturtletalks
15 hours ago
Given enough time, open-source will win. Just think about how more and more people are programming and how that will draw them to open-source.
15 hours ago
Given enough time, open-source will win. Just think about how more and more people are programming and how that will draw them to open-source.
> development for 28 years now
> given enough time
This has been a lifetime for a slice of the human population.
It’s getting into Sagrada Familia territory.
This is an absolute tangent (a perpendicular one if you will), but I thought the Sagrada Familia is completed: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ceciliarodriguez/2026/06/10/bar...
The article talks about construction on the exterior, the cross on the main tower, the Pope's visit and commemoration of the architect, etc. while on the official website the timeline says "Today, more than 140 years after the laying of the cornerstone, construction continues on the Basilica": https://sagradafamilia.org/en/history-of-the-temple
So which one is it? Is this one of those cases where we have to define "done" first?
The exterior is done, the interior not yet
1 reply →
> It’s getting into Sagrada Familia territory.
Or "A million monkeys with a million typewriters writing Shakespeare" territory
See, at this rate it won’t even take a century!
Only if it keeps being relevant for the computing model.
Case in point, ReactOS is far behind what Windows 11 is capable of, and this not taking into account the ARM and CoPilot+ PC hardware changes in modern motherboards.
It is nonetheless relevant, especially in the presence of escape mechanisms to oppressive governments, and digital sovereignty.
> ReactOS is far behind what Windows 11 is capable of
lol I guess, it doesn’t annoy you with endless ads and pop ups, doesn’t try to steal your data and passwords, doesn’t force you to buy an entire new computer just to run it. Far behind indeed.
You joke, yet there are plenty of missing actually useful features, some of which even Linux lags behind with exception of Android/Linux.
2 replies →
Heh, wouldn't it be funny if some of the EU gov's decided to sponsor ReactOS for another/future pathway away from Redmond. :)
It could be, but I would rather see SuSE on that, or similar.
> It is nonetheless relevant, especially in the presence of escape mechanisms to oppressive governments, and digital sovereignty.
Not just for that. There's an awful, awful lot of ancient embedded hardware running machinery sometimes worth dozens of millions of dollars, and it's running even more ancient software. Siemens, for example, recently searched for people capable of (and willing to) working with Windows 3.11 [1], presumably to deal with the HMI displays for locomotive/train drivers.
When dealing with hardware or software that has lifecycles measured in half-centuries, bridges to allow modern tooling to work with it are really, really important.
[1] https://www.heise.de/news/Deutsche-Bahn-sucht-Admin-fuer-Win...
There are millions of Windows 95 embedded in industrial or government machines. Millions.
3 replies →
It's far easier to port ReactOS than Windows to ARM and other new CPU ISAs.
Windows is already there.
2 replies →
IF there are people who write code.
This is not always the case. Open source projects also die.
We need to improve the funding situation. I have no idea how to do that, but we really need to tackle that problem.
more people and AI
Specifications are important.
The better the specs of a commercial product, the easier it would be to produce an open source version it, with coding and testing automation perhaps even a one-to-one offering.
this is the year of the linux desktop
I have been exclusively running linux on my desktop for 25 years, so from my point of view, this "joke" is a quarter century out of date