Comment by benj111

>Losing a few percents in efficiency is an acceptable compromise for avoiding the use of expensive and supply-constrained chemical elements.

Is it? A 1% decrease in efficiency means increased fuel costs for the user. Acceptability should be based on the long term costs v short term savings to the customer.

It's this myopic, Thinking from the pov of the company, that leads to enshittification. I don't think we should be unquestionly accept that pov.