Comment by includenotfound
2 days ago
> People who look up to Donald Trump unsurprisingly feel his genius moves are hard to read
I don't look up to Trump but this is phrased incredibly condescending of you. You are directly implying that people who like Trump are stupid.
How do you gauge the tone of the reply I was answering to? You can't really be edgy to people on the Internet and not ever expect a pushback.
You're clearly devaluating a group of people.
"unsurprisingly": these people are predictable (by you, in this case)
"his genius moves": hyperbole, you clearly think they are not
You're saying people predictably like Trump's obviously bad moves AND are simultaneously incapable of reading these obvious moves (to paraphrase you without the snark). Then you're associating that with "petty thug mentality", as if people were too stupid not to look up to a criminal.
You are the edgy one here, and in fact smug about it. At least post proof of stock positions, otherwise you're just confidently accusing people of being stupid while not putting your money where your mouth is.
Notice how you ignored my question. I’m not sure if it’s malice or comprehension issue. Either way it’s not adding to the strength of your argument.
5 replies →
Does it need to be implied?