Comment by ElProlactin
11 hours ago
How so? If you're anti-surveillance, wouldn't you be pleased that under-16s won't be able to use the most wide-ranging and insidious surveillance platforms ever created?
11 hours ago
How so? If you're anti-surveillance, wouldn't you be pleased that under-16s won't be able to use the most wide-ranging and insidious surveillance platforms ever created?
Until they turn 17, then they get to be id-verified surveilled like the rest of us!
Much safe system. Very cozy. Glad kids are safe now. That was close!
So what's your solution?
There's substantial evidence for harms on young people that go beyond surveillance, but I guess we now live in a society that embraces throw them to the wolves and see which ones survive?
The only proper solution always used for children. Parent's discretion.
Other people's kids are not my nor the governments business.
I will restrict social media as I see fit for my children. Don't need a nanny state.
No need for "think of the children". You shouldn't be thinking of my children, they are fine. Worry about yourself and your own kids.
1 reply →