← Back to context

Comment by fer

1 day ago

For a while a "cv2vec" lingered in my mind, but abandoned it due to the sheer volume of PII I'd need.

How do you deal with CVs like mine that refuse to list every <fancy keyword> I'm familiar with because it's pointless clutter? In that sense, and IME, the companies that only hire perfect fits are, more often than not, toxic.

Hiring Method is an auxiliary tool that does not take any hiring decision. The vector it builds has few dozen parameters, with hard skills (eg plain old technology list) constituting a mere fraction. In this way you do not have to have all fancy buzzwords – the software also checks for neighboring stacks and transferrability level, among other fitness criteria.