← Back to context Comment by stasomatic 3 days ago It doesn’t matter, I was speaking in terms of branding. There is ++ in C, but C is not C++. 1 comment stasomatic Reply steveklabnik 3 days ago Right, but the whole reason C++ is named C++ is because ++ is a valid operator in C. Without the operator in Rust, making the brand of a successor based on a feature from an entirely different language doesn't make any sense.
steveklabnik 3 days ago Right, but the whole reason C++ is named C++ is because ++ is a valid operator in C. Without the operator in Rust, making the brand of a successor based on a feature from an entirely different language doesn't make any sense.
Right, but the whole reason C++ is named C++ is because ++ is a valid operator in C. Without the operator in Rust, making the brand of a successor based on a feature from an entirely different language doesn't make any sense.