← Back to context

Comment by flotzam

15 hours ago

Ah. That makes sense. Maybe the polite fiction would clash too obviously with accounting standards once the (de facto) lowered rent payments roll in: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567769

Could the situation be improved then if financial regulators started treating both versions ("temporary" vacancy / "temporarily" lowered rent) equally? Tolerate both or crack down on both.

Banks maintain the capital/liquidity ratio’s they’re told they have too.

People are actually advocating for looser lending requirements, which I’m perfectly fine with but the result might not be what they expect either.