← Back to context Comment by embedding-shape 17 hours ago > not a re-skinIs that something you're frequently accused of, or why the "disclaimer"? 4 comments embedding-shape Reply drcongo 17 hours ago They were directly answering the post above which asked if it's a re-skin. BrenBarn 17 hours ago The comment they were replying to specifically asked if it was a re-skin. embedding-shape 17 hours ago Ah yes of course, finally paid the price of reading comments in isolation. Thanks and sorry :) viermalbe 17 hours ago Not really, I just picked it up from the initial question from stakhanov.
BrenBarn 17 hours ago The comment they were replying to specifically asked if it was a re-skin. embedding-shape 17 hours ago Ah yes of course, finally paid the price of reading comments in isolation. Thanks and sorry :)
embedding-shape 17 hours ago Ah yes of course, finally paid the price of reading comments in isolation. Thanks and sorry :)
They were directly answering the post above which asked if it's a re-skin.
The comment they were replying to specifically asked if it was a re-skin.
Ah yes of course, finally paid the price of reading comments in isolation. Thanks and sorry :)
Not really, I just picked it up from the initial question from stakhanov.