Comment by stackghost
10 hours ago
I think everyone knows that this is a consequence of git's design. Nobody's disputing that.
Unfortunately there are many people who think git is a panacea and is suitable for all version control tasks of anything.
10 hours ago
I think everyone knows that this is a consequence of git's design. Nobody's disputing that.
Unfortunately there are many people who think git is a panacea and is suitable for all version control tasks of anything.
And a few of them think that it is corporate structure and development models that are actually the problem.
I'm just asking questions!
I don't understand what you're trying to imply.
If you're making the point that there are multiple confounding factors to just about any non-trivial problem, then I agree.
No, I'm making the point that the way in which git doesn't fit well into many corporate processes can be interpreted as more of a negative commentary on those processes than on git.
1 reply →