← Back to context Comment by wasabi991011 8 hours ago Is there a way to read this without a Twitter account? 8 comments wasabi991011 Reply malchow 7 hours ago https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bicycle-joseph-malchow-liv9c/ wasabi991011 5 hours ago Thanks WithinReason 7 hours ago https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2067293746556027376GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results. wasabi991011 5 hours ago Thanks, but this wasn't the link I was referring to fuzzfactor 7 minutes ago https://x.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061requires Twitter sign inhttps://xcancel.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061does not, although sometimes spotty CamperBob2 4 hours ago It kills me how many scientific researchers in various fields still rely on X. Every time they post or read a tweet, they are subsidizing the guy who wants more than anything else -- having already gained everything else -- to put them out of a job. FigurativeVoid 8 hours ago It looks like xcancel doesn't support articles yet. There may be another service?
malchow 7 hours ago https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bicycle-joseph-malchow-liv9c/ wasabi991011 5 hours ago Thanks
WithinReason 7 hours ago https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2067293746556027376GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results. wasabi991011 5 hours ago Thanks, but this wasn't the link I was referring to fuzzfactor 7 minutes ago https://x.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061requires Twitter sign inhttps://xcancel.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061does not, although sometimes spotty
wasabi991011 5 hours ago Thanks, but this wasn't the link I was referring to fuzzfactor 7 minutes ago https://x.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061requires Twitter sign inhttps://xcancel.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061does not, although sometimes spotty
fuzzfactor 7 minutes ago https://x.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061requires Twitter sign inhttps://xcancel.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061does not, although sometimes spotty
CamperBob2 4 hours ago It kills me how many scientific researchers in various fields still rely on X. Every time they post or read a tweet, they are subsidizing the guy who wants more than anything else -- having already gained everything else -- to put them out of a job.
FigurativeVoid 8 hours ago It looks like xcancel doesn't support articles yet. There may be another service?
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bicycle-joseph-malchow-liv9c/
Thanks
https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2067293746556027376
GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.
Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.
Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.
Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.
Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.
The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results.
Thanks, but this wasn't the link I was referring to
https://x.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061
requires Twitter sign in
https://xcancel.com/jmalchow/status/2067298271647904061
does not, although sometimes spotty
It kills me how many scientific researchers in various fields still rely on X. Every time they post or read a tweet, they are subsidizing the guy who wants more than anything else -- having already gained everything else -- to put them out of a job.
It looks like xcancel doesn't support articles yet. There may be another service?