← Back to context Comment by KolmogorovComp 5 hours ago Thanks for the writing, which would have been even better had it been written by a human. 3 comments KolmogorovComp Reply theorchid 4 hours ago Why do you think it wasn't written by a human? KolmogorovComp 3 hours ago Have you read the article?> that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity.> the attacker’s own profile? no bio, no avatar, 499 contributions crammed into january–february 2026.> this wasn’t random> i reported the repo to github. the ticket is open. but this raises a question i keep coming back to theorchid 2 hours ago Thanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article.I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere.Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.
theorchid 4 hours ago Why do you think it wasn't written by a human? KolmogorovComp 3 hours ago Have you read the article?> that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity.> the attacker’s own profile? no bio, no avatar, 499 contributions crammed into january–february 2026.> this wasn’t random> i reported the repo to github. the ticket is open. but this raises a question i keep coming back to theorchid 2 hours ago Thanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article.I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere.Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.
KolmogorovComp 3 hours ago Have you read the article?> that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity.> the attacker’s own profile? no bio, no avatar, 499 contributions crammed into january–february 2026.> this wasn’t random> i reported the repo to github. the ticket is open. but this raises a question i keep coming back to theorchid 2 hours ago Thanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article.I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere.Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.
theorchid 2 hours ago Thanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article.I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere.Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.
Why do you think it wasn't written by a human?
Have you read the article?
> that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity.
> the attacker’s own profile? no bio, no avatar, 499 contributions crammed into january–february 2026.
> this wasn’t random
> i reported the repo to github. the ticket is open. but this raises a question i keep coming back to
Thanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article.
I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere.
Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.