Comment by WalterBright
7 hours ago
> Unwelcome attention is unwelcome attention
Quite right. Allow me to rephrase:
What about the non-creepy men?
7 hours ago
> Unwelcome attention is unwelcome attention
Quite right. Allow me to rephrase:
What about the non-creepy men?
It's very telling that you think creepy and ugly are you synonyms and non-creepy and attractive are synonyms.
Those guys are creepy too.
If they're a non-creepy guy, it's because they don't behave like a creep. Not because they're handsome.
You mean, what about the tall, handsome, well-dressed creepy men?
The dichotomy is not conventionally attractive/creepy, it's understands boundaries/creepy.
If all men are creepy, then why bother with the adjective?
You're still hung up on this idea that violating boundaries and being a man are synonymous, and that what makes it creepy is how attractive you are.
Whether someone is attractive or not, they're perfectly capable of not bothering someone who doesn't want to be bothered.
You're basically saying "if an unattractive man who doesn't respect boundaries is creepy, but also an attractive man that doesn't respect boundaries is creepy, then that means all men are creepy."