← Back to context

Comment by bell-cot

8 hours ago

Maybe HN should ban words matching "surpris" from Titles?

Even if you are clueless about the international arms trade - South Korea has maintained a huge military for the past 70-ish years, as part of their endless cold war with North Korea. And South Korea has been really big on manufacturing and exporting all sorts of stuff for the past half-ish-century. Why the hell wouldn't they be selling the military things that they are building anyway, at scale, to any and every non-enemy with money to spend?

5 comments

bell-cot

Reply
tartoran  2 hours ago

I don’t know what your point really is. Yes Korea has been already selling arms, but as of recently, they stepped up drastically. This is what this article is about. Is the title wrong? That’s an issue with most titles these days

nine_k  1 hour ago

There are, sadly, many places of conflicts smoldering for years; not all of them, if any, ended up in production of exportable weapons. E.g. Taiwan is preparing for a PRC invasion for decades; did it produce exportable weapons systems?

So there is an element of surprise. Maybe not as large as North Korea exporting ballistic missiles to Russia [1], but still.

[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/25/how-north-kore...

dredmorbius  5 hours ago

Email suggestions (specific submission title edits, general edit-rewriting rules) to the mods: hn@ycombinator.com.

HN guidelines typically prefer sourcing a title from the text of the document itself. Given Politico seem to be rotating through clickbait variants (the presently displayed title is "Trump Is Tired of Arming Allies. This Country Is Stepping Up.", the submitted title appears elsewhere in the page source), I'd suggest:

"The rise of South Korea’s weapons business"

Which is non-clickbaity, succinct, clear, and accurate. It appears at the start of the 4th body 'graph.

I'd argue it's superior to the subtitle "The U.S. retreat from the global stage is an opportunity for South Korea.", as that option fails to indicate the nature of that opportunity. South Korea and arms trade are the key elements discussed.