Comment by ck2

isn't the simple answer an age-limit for VPN? /s

all this because they refuse to make the law just

"legal parent/guardian is responsible for the child"

if a parent faced fine or jail for a child having access to the internet you can be sure 90% of the children wouldn't have internet access

I'm no defender of the big social/media sites but I don't see why it's their fault/problem if a minor has internet access when they aren't supposed to

This all feels like the opposite goal of knowing everyone who is online everywhere

Because it's not how you'd make the law, you'd wouldn't go to service by service and make it their problem, you'd make it the adult responsible for the child's problem