← Back to context

Comment by pembrook

12 hours ago

I think you and I disagree. I don’t think Jesper is focused on the right issues.

Big tech (private companies who largely just care about profits) and foreign governments (the Americans for example), are way lower on my “things Europe should be worried” about list. They’re there of course, but lower.

Private companies don’t have the ability to ruin your life in the same way your own government does. They just want your money. And the US government is truly a disinterested party. 99% of Americans couldn’t place Denmark on a map (I’m not kidding). When push comes to shove, they fundamentally do not care what happens here.

The real threat is our own governments, who we have given the legal authority to enact all the negative outcomes that will come from totalitarian erosions of privacy and over regulation of individuals. Building up this scary “foreign boogieman” and stoking this moral panic is what is enabling the authoritarian action.

Pointing fingers at Big Tech and the US is a giant distraction tactic so you don’t look at the terrible things our own domestic politicians have done and the fact they have zero plans to do the hard things needed to get us out of this mess. It's just champagne and smiling over dinner, while the old eat the young, the government eats the private sector, and endless legislation eats away your opportunity to do anything more exciting than build powerpoints at a braindead consulting firm.

> Private companies don’t have the ability to ruin your life in the same way your own government does. They just want your money.

And what happens when your money is gone? What happens when the government has no money anymore because the super rich took it all? Your life turns to shit real fast when you can't afford housing, healthcare and food.

I get when you are in an authoritarian country, or one on the path to becoming so like the US, that the government looks to be the most dangerous actor. But in the west that is still free, its the corps that I worry about the most.

  • Private companies want your money but they don’t take it. You give it to them in exchange for something.

    • It feels like I'm force to pay tax which then evaporates into the pockets of private companies like Palantir, though... I mean, you arguably can't even fully participate in the society you pay taxes to help run if you don't have a Google or Apple spycube.

      1 reply →

  • You’re fundamentally worried about the wrong thing.

    It’s an extremely common bias on the left just as the anti-government bias on the right.

    Both public and private entities are capable of abusing power.

    Only one group however is legally entitled to take 50% of your money regardless of the quality of their product, by holding a gun to your head. They can even take more via the phantom tax of inflation using deficit spending (as is happening now all over Europe). This group is the one you should fear more if looking at it from first principles.

    The current runaway deficits across Europe and rising political unrest prove this.

    The only thing companies can do to “take” your money is offer you a service that’s better than all alternatives that you chose to buy voluntarily.

    If you think that’s the bigger authoritarian risk something is wrong with your mental model of how the world works.

If you think that Jesper isn't attacking the right issues, but Lars does, then you should definitely hope that Lars switches to Jesper's more popular approach.

Unless you think there can never be a democratic consensus in favor of privacy, therefore the only way is for a small vanguard of privacy activists to impose their will on the hostile majority and establish a totalitarian privacy dictatorship. Then it wouldn't matter so much whether you look good in the court of popular opinion or not.

  • You can not “democratically” decide to abolish certain inalienable personal liberties and still pretend you are a democracy. That’s just mob rule or worse.

    > totalitarian privacy dictatorship

    That’s an illogical concept. What does that even mean?

  • You're turning things on their heads. Currently there's some modicum of privacy. Politicians are trying to force removal of this on everyone.

> 99% of Americans couldn’t place Denmark on a map (I’m not kidding)

sixty one percent of statistics are fabricated on the spot?