← Back to context

Comment by Animats

1 day ago

The announcement says both

Wikipedia workers in Britain are setting a “global first” by becoming the first body of workers at the online encyclopaedia to seek union recognition.

and

Outside the United States, the United Kingdom is WMF’s largest employment location, and a substantial majority of its UK staff are union members.

Something is inconsistent here. Are they trying to unionize people who edit Wikipedia for free?

There are other lines in the post that, to me, provide clarity.

First is this, the second paragraph:

> British-based employees at the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) wrote a letter to management today (Wednesday 24thJune) requesting their right to be represented by the United Tech and Allied Workers (UTAW) section of the Communication Workers Union (CWU).

That makes it clear that this is regarding the "British-based employees at the Wikimedia Foundation". Yes, the headline does say "Wikipedia": I expect the CWU chose that because many more folks know what Wikipedia is, vs. the Wikimedia foundation.

Second is this:

> Over 1000 Wikimedia volunteers and community members have also signed petitions in support of the workers, who have networked globally under the banner of Wiki Workers United (WWU).

I view terms like "[wikipedia] editors" as terms of art: "Editor" in the Wikipedia context maps to the more-generic "volunteer" in the broader context, which is why the post is referring here to "volunteers and community members".

So, I don't see any inconsistency in the article, but I see how the current post title can make it confusing.

In my opinion, I think it would be appropriate for you to email the HN folks, to ask the title be changed to something like "Wikimedia Foundation Workers to Seek Union Recognition".

You can be a member of a labor union without that union being recognized as your exclusive bargaining representative for a certain employer (or whatever unit).

I read that as the majority of wikimedia employees in the uk have joined the union, but the union has yet to be recognized by the company with a collective agreement.

I think it’s the WMF employees who are unionising, as in salaried employees.