← Back to context

Comment by matchagaucho

3 hours ago

Similar work experience, I was with a CBS-owned music company that had a CNC machine with some old Fender Telecaster and Stratocaster body templates.

The hardware manager was cool and would let employees turn slabs of wood into Tele- and Strat-style bodies after hours.

When the Fender/German court ruling came down, my first thought was: Fender has had roughly 70 years with the Stratocaster design, and the broader industry has been making S-style guitars for decades.

Surely at some point a body shape becomes generic, right?

Things become generic if you stop defending them/enforcing your IP.

I think the iPhone at one time defended the design of its “squircle” corners. Eventually settling out of court.

  • I think you're thinking of trademark, but this isn't a trademark claim, it's a copyright infringement claim. The legal question is whether the guitar shape can be copyrighted.

    • That is the legal question FMIC think they have settled with this legal win, yes.

      Two legal questions they will now be asked, by Thomann or LsL, are:

      - if such a copyright could exist, what shape precisely are Fender arguing it would cover?

      - if such a copyright could exist, would Fender (the company) have title to it?

      Answering these questions could get them into some difficulty, legally. Neither are obvious and the second one is really problematic.