← Back to context Comment by hyperpape 5 hours ago Sounds like the real number is 454x faster, not 70x. Checkmate, nerd! 2 comments hyperpape Reply sscaryterry 5 hours ago Go read my message again. Every time somebody states it is X time faster, and its the headline, it is pure clickbait.Yes, you have benchmarks, they will always be synthetic. I'm not dismissing the work, just the selling of it.You have succeeded though, I did click on it. I even said "Good read" :) robbie-c 5 hours ago :DI was hoping to avoid the criticism that I was picking the most favourable number and being misleading!
sscaryterry 5 hours ago Go read my message again. Every time somebody states it is X time faster, and its the headline, it is pure clickbait.Yes, you have benchmarks, they will always be synthetic. I'm not dismissing the work, just the selling of it.You have succeeded though, I did click on it. I even said "Good read" :)
robbie-c 5 hours ago :DI was hoping to avoid the criticism that I was picking the most favourable number and being misleading!
Go read my message again. Every time somebody states it is X time faster, and its the headline, it is pure clickbait.
Yes, you have benchmarks, they will always be synthetic. I'm not dismissing the work, just the selling of it.
You have succeeded though, I did click on it. I even said "Good read" :)
:D
I was hoping to avoid the criticism that I was picking the most favourable number and being misleading!