← Back to context Comment by bozhark 3 hours ago How inefficient 2 comments bozhark Reply cl0ckt0wer 3 hours ago Way more efficient, that's why they do it. Evaporating water carries an enormous amount of energy. quickthrowman 3 hours ago It uses almost half as much electricity, it’s way more efficient than air cooled chillers by themselves.East of the 100 degree W line of longitude, there is more than enough water to use evaporative cooling if needed.
cl0ckt0wer 3 hours ago Way more efficient, that's why they do it. Evaporating water carries an enormous amount of energy.
quickthrowman 3 hours ago It uses almost half as much electricity, it’s way more efficient than air cooled chillers by themselves.East of the 100 degree W line of longitude, there is more than enough water to use evaporative cooling if needed.
Way more efficient, that's why they do it. Evaporating water carries an enormous amount of energy.
It uses almost half as much electricity, it’s way more efficient than air cooled chillers by themselves.
East of the 100 degree W line of longitude, there is more than enough water to use evaporative cooling if needed.