← Back to context Comment by __alexs 11 hours ago What happened to innocent until proven guilty? 3 comments __alexs Reply zygentoma 9 hours ago "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crime, not whether something is a crime.An action can clearly be a crime, but it might be unclear if you did that action. dctoedt 1 hour ago > "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crimeSee my upthread comment: "Innocent until proven guilty" is catchy but false. __alexs 3 hours ago Only our legal institutions and the frameworks they create can decide if any specific act is a crime.
zygentoma 9 hours ago "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crime, not whether something is a crime.An action can clearly be a crime, but it might be unclear if you did that action. dctoedt 1 hour ago > "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crimeSee my upthread comment: "Innocent until proven guilty" is catchy but false. __alexs 3 hours ago Only our legal institutions and the frameworks they create can decide if any specific act is a crime.
dctoedt 1 hour ago > "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crimeSee my upthread comment: "Innocent until proven guilty" is catchy but false.
__alexs 3 hours ago Only our legal institutions and the frameworks they create can decide if any specific act is a crime.
"Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crime, not whether something is a crime.
An action can clearly be a crime, but it might be unclear if you did that action.
> "Innocent until proven guilty" concerns whether someone did a crime
See my upthread comment: "Innocent until proven guilty" is catchy but false.
Only our legal institutions and the frameworks they create can decide if any specific act is a crime.