Comment by JBits
9 hours ago
Is there any reason why they're not considering a single '?' like rust? Is it a parsing issue?
So you'd have: obj?:method(…)
9 hours ago
Is there any reason why they're not considering a single '?' like rust? Is it a parsing issue?
So you'd have: obj?:method(…)
Mike Pall wrote in the issue that it's easier to parse. If they get rid of the ternary operator, I'll ask him again to drop the period.
a lone ? can mean anything, you can already tell that . is for fetching a subtable.
In C# it's not a lone ?, it's two operators: ?. and ?[
Lua could have ?. ?[ ?" ?{ and ?(