Output is a separate issue from training. Courts will never decide that a identical copy spit out by an LLM is non-infringing simply because it went through an LLM stage. Copyright laundering is wishful thinking by tech folks.
Then they will leave the huge advantage in cost to the competition, I mean their customers competitors.
Hard to fathom how US companies will not want to use the cheaper option when EU and Asian companies can.
a: If making it illegal fails, make it a Federal procurement requirement to use regulated models. Come up with an audit standard that only fits regulated models. Watch the preference trickle down.
License the training corpus and encourage copyright suits against outputs from models trained on unlicensed corpora.
This won't work if the courts decide that training is fair use, which certainly seems the direction they are going.
Output is a separate issue from training. Courts will never decide that a identical copy spit out by an LLM is non-infringing simply because it went through an LLM stage. Copyright laundering is wishful thinking by tech folks.
I like to think of llms as seamless plagiarism machines.
Why illegal, just pass these 3000 pages FAA-level certification, export controls and KYC. We're free country, after all!
pretty much what altman and amodei mean when they say 'safety'.
Then they will leave the huge advantage in cost to the competition, I mean their customers competitors. Hard to fathom how US companies will not want to use the cheaper option when EU and Asian companies can.
a: If making it illegal fails, make it a Federal procurement requirement to use regulated models. Come up with an audit standard that only fits regulated models. Watch the preference trickle down.
[dead]