← Back to context Comment by irdc 6 hours ago Papermark is AGPL; Corgi must release all its changes. 7 comments irdc Reply lenerdenator 6 hours ago That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be. galangalalgol 6 hours ago Copyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation. brookst 5 hours ago You wouldn’t steal a car! 1 reply → josephg 6 hours ago Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either. irdc 6 hours ago So we're in violent agreement then? lenerdenator 6 hours ago Brutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand
lenerdenator 6 hours ago That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be. galangalalgol 6 hours ago Copyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation. brookst 5 hours ago You wouldn’t steal a car! 1 reply → josephg 6 hours ago Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either. irdc 6 hours ago So we're in violent agreement then? lenerdenator 6 hours ago Brutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand
galangalalgol 6 hours ago Copyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation. brookst 5 hours ago You wouldn’t steal a car! 1 reply →
josephg 6 hours ago Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either.
irdc 6 hours ago So we're in violent agreement then? lenerdenator 6 hours ago Brutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand
That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be.
Copyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation.
You wouldn’t steal a car!
1 reply →
Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.
Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either.
So we're in violent agreement then?
Brutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand