← Back to context Comment by olluk 6 hours ago Close your source if you don't want it to be read by LLM 3 comments olluk Reply goldenarm 6 hours ago That's not how licenses work, Papermark is AGPL olluk 5 hours ago I agree. It's a sarcasm of the new reality. What is copying vs writing from scratch? The line is blurred now, non-existent. You can ask an LLM to re-write any open source to a degree where there is no definite way to say that it's a derivative. ActionHank 6 hours ago "If Disney wants to retain their rights to Mickey they really shouldn't be showing any images of him to the world."
goldenarm 6 hours ago That's not how licenses work, Papermark is AGPL olluk 5 hours ago I agree. It's a sarcasm of the new reality. What is copying vs writing from scratch? The line is blurred now, non-existent. You can ask an LLM to re-write any open source to a degree where there is no definite way to say that it's a derivative.
olluk 5 hours ago I agree. It's a sarcasm of the new reality. What is copying vs writing from scratch? The line is blurred now, non-existent. You can ask an LLM to re-write any open source to a degree where there is no definite way to say that it's a derivative.
ActionHank 6 hours ago "If Disney wants to retain their rights to Mickey they really shouldn't be showing any images of him to the world."
That's not how licenses work, Papermark is AGPL
I agree. It's a sarcasm of the new reality. What is copying vs writing from scratch? The line is blurred now, non-existent. You can ask an LLM to re-write any open source to a degree where there is no definite way to say that it's a derivative.
"If Disney wants to retain their rights to Mickey they really shouldn't be showing any images of him to the world."