← Back to context Comment by micw 1 day ago So the title should be corrected. The did not debut sub nm chips at all. 2 comments micw Reply antisthenes 1 day ago That ship sailed long ago. I think it was around 32nm-22nm node when the marketing term started diverging from the physical feature size. micw 1 day ago More reason to frame it correctly, like "IBM debuts another 5 nanometer chip technology, selling it as sub nanometer chip technology"
antisthenes 1 day ago That ship sailed long ago. I think it was around 32nm-22nm node when the marketing term started diverging from the physical feature size. micw 1 day ago More reason to frame it correctly, like "IBM debuts another 5 nanometer chip technology, selling it as sub nanometer chip technology"
micw 1 day ago More reason to frame it correctly, like "IBM debuts another 5 nanometer chip technology, selling it as sub nanometer chip technology"
That ship sailed long ago. I think it was around 32nm-22nm node when the marketing term started diverging from the physical feature size.
More reason to frame it correctly, like "IBM debuts another 5 nanometer chip technology, selling it as sub nanometer chip technology"