← Back to context

Comment by digitaltrees

11 days ago

Open source is looking great right now

This isn't going to save you unless you're ok being a criminal. There is nothing stopping the government from making open source versions of these models equally controlled.

And given how willy-nilly they are operating I see no reason they won't clamp down on open source. All it takes is someone with connections/political contributions wakes up one day and realizes that open source is a threat to their power or bottom line and it will be declared an imminent threat with no oversight or debate.

It’s looking very fragile from a legal point of view. Ownership of compute and software freedom will be next k the chopping block after control of networks that’s occurring at the moment.

It's looking good until you start to see the US gov forcing cloudflare to block hugging face and others.

  • They'll just make it a crime to run the models unless they authorize you (classifying it as a munition, like they tried to do with encryption), and if your power bill is suspicious you'll find yourself in jail.

    Any company providing the models will be deemed a threat to national security.

    No need to block the download.

    • Citizens were and are free to use the technology (cryptography and every other export-controlled item); your "power bill is suspicious, go to jail" FUD doesn't really track with history.

      > Any company providing the models will be deemed a threat to national security.

      Any company providing specifically-controlled models to foreigners would hypothetically be prosecuted.

      9 replies →

  • Why do they need to "force Cloudflare" to do anything?

    Why wouldn't they just tell Hugging Face that they need to abide export restrictions directly - they're an American company?

    Doesn't sound dystopian enough without a second compelled entity?

    • Because the models don't necessarily need to be hosted on hugging face. You can create a Model Card repository containing your README and from there you include instructions or a custom script in your repository that allows authenticated users to download the model.

      > Doesn't sound dystopian enough without a second compelled entity?

      This is the second snarky question you've made today, the other in relation to the export limit.

      > Is this just upsetting because it's a product you want to enjoy?

      Both are assumptions you are making and don't provide much in the way of constructive conversation, if I'm wrong about something it's alright to just point it out.

      4 replies →

seriously, ordered more hardware this week, as it gets more dystopian every week

wondering when more people will raise their voice and get engaged

  • History shows that people generally start speaking out about things after it's too late to do so.

    • More specifically, the masses here are well satisfied with proverbial bread and circuses.

      We won't see mass action until enough people have literally nothing left to lose. For now, folks have plenty to risk and lose by taking action. There is not nearly enough homelessness or starvation yet for people to rise up. The masses are surprisingly tolerant of authoritarian oppression so long as food can keep being put on the table.

      1 reply →

It's the year of the open source AI model is the new 'It's the year of the Linux Desktop'. It's not and never will be for 90% of people

  • That’s not true at all. While not as good as proprietary models they are still very good and can do A LOT, certainly more than their cost would make it seem.

    It’s only a matter of time before companies start to acknowledge the huge cost of tokens and look for a cheaper alternative with basic cost-benefit analysis.

    My F500 company is getting local infrastructure going to host open models and I’m sure many will just switch to bedrock + the best open models.

    It’s foolish for companies to let three companies dictate the price of tokens, I just don’t think they are aware of this now by and large.