← Back to context

Comment by quantumwoke

11 days ago

And what about the rest of the world? I can't imagine US partners will abide this for long.

They get the dual-use scraps or whatever China is hawking.

Being told "no" is never fun, but the regulations are not hard to comply with (despite what Anthropic might have you believe.)

> I can't imagine US partners will abide this for long.

What are they going to do? Start their own Anthropic? Go for it. Why is every other country in the world entitled to American technology by default?

  • > What are they going to do? Start their own Anthropic? Go for it. Why is every other country in the world entitled to American technology by default?

    Because American tech companies make a lot of money from outside of the US. For instance, 1/4 of all Apple revenues are from Europe, and 1/5 from China and China-claimed territories. Only around 40% are from the Americas (so not even the US exclusively).

    Would American tech companies be as successfull without ~half their revenues?

    In any case, it doesn't matter, the cat is out of the bag. Nobody sane and non-American would trust American frontier labs, because their models can be yanked at will by whoever is in the White House. It would be suicidal to rely on them for critical business or developer workflows. So your options are to go with Mistral or open source Chinese models, hosted within your environment, with the added benefits of being able to control the costs and being able to fine tune the models to better work for you.

    • > Would American tech companies be as successfull without ~half their revenues?

      Good luck with "if you don't let us use your AI technology, we wont allow iPhones in" - go for it.

      7 replies →

  • > but the regulations are not hard to comply with

    Except that they are.

    As a US citizen, I can purchase ITAR-regulated nightvision, IR lasers, etc.

    But that's not what's happening. Frontier models are NOT being put under ITAR. Instead, they are being placed on an arbitrary "approved access" list. So that even if you qualify under export restrictions as a citizen, if you don't have a $200B+ market cap, you're disqualified.

    Many people are upset about the national security restrictions, but it's MUCH WORSE than that. If I have to verify ID/citizenship, well, that sucks, but it would at least be an option. That's not what's happening here. If you are an individual or small business, no matter how "patriotic" you might be, you're out of luck.

    • > Except that they are.

      Did you read the E.O., or just Huffpo's interpretation?

      > ITAR

      This is more likely to fall under EAR, it's important to be aware-of and learn the difference.

      > placed on an arbitrary "approved access" list.

      Except that's not what the original E.O. indicated, this is just what Anthropic is choosing to do.

      1 reply →

  • > Why is every other country in the world entitled to American technology by default?

    This kind of zero-sum thinking is what is killing the US's global influence right now.

    • Except it isn't zero-sum thinking: the rest of the world can have the scraps, and as long as the scraps are marginally better than the rest of the world's offerings, they will sell.

      3 replies →