← Back to context

Comment by pixel_popping

3 months ago

[flagged]

Surely you can see the difference between “the personal life of founders” and “the founder of this company is by far the largest donor to a party in favour of ethnic cleansing and thus I don’t want to buy his products”?

What?

The reason he has those millions to give is because of the money he made from Mullvad, no?

If he separates that, I’ll happily separate my judgement as well.

  • you are saying that if that founder earned from scam websites while running Mullvad, then it would have been fine to sponsor that association with the crime money, but not Mullvad money, yes?

    • I’m saying it’s perfectly reasonable for someone to not want to support Mullvad if part of their money indirectly goes to that association.

There's "personal life" and then theres being 75% of the funding of a party calling for ethnic cleansing...