← Back to context Comment by hmate9 10 days ago What is this prediction based on? 4 comments hmate9 Reply ddp26 10 days ago Based on my conjecture that Anthropic is ahead on AI research, and that OpenAI doesn't know how to make Fable-class models. Onavo 10 days ago Fable is allegedly a massive model (estimates between 6-10+ trillion, with a few hundred billion active). If 5.6 is just an incremental upgrade over 5.5 (at the same model size) then it won't be able to fully compete with Fable just yet. gpm 10 days ago I suspect the same just based on their versioning scheme fwiw. jstummbillig 10 days ago solid
ddp26 10 days ago Based on my conjecture that Anthropic is ahead on AI research, and that OpenAI doesn't know how to make Fable-class models.
Onavo 10 days ago Fable is allegedly a massive model (estimates between 6-10+ trillion, with a few hundred billion active). If 5.6 is just an incremental upgrade over 5.5 (at the same model size) then it won't be able to fully compete with Fable just yet.
gpm 10 days ago I suspect the same just based on their versioning scheme fwiw. jstummbillig 10 days ago solid
Based on my conjecture that Anthropic is ahead on AI research, and that OpenAI doesn't know how to make Fable-class models.
Fable is allegedly a massive model (estimates between 6-10+ trillion, with a few hundred billion active). If 5.6 is just an incremental upgrade over 5.5 (at the same model size) then it won't be able to fully compete with Fable just yet.
I suspect the same just based on their versioning scheme fwiw.
solid