← Back to context

Comment by antonvs

3 days ago

It’s not just “social media”. Any site that’s funded by advertising fits that description.

But there are also other requirements in section 201 for a "covered platform", which advertising-funded sites that aren't "social media" most likely don't meet. For example, a typical personal blog, even if it shows ads, doesn't meet subsection (C), because its primary purpose is not to share user-generated content (e.g., comments by readers)--it's to share the blog author's content.

(HN itself doesn't meet at least one other requirement besides subsection (E): subsection (D), "Uses a design feature to promote user engagement on the platform".)

Only if it's targeted.

  • True, but in practice, the vast majority of advertising-funded sites use targeted advertising, because they use standard ad networks. There are very few ads networks that don’t do targeted ads.

    • Right but if we could kill that business model by making platforms chose between age verification and non-targeted ads, that would be a win right?

      That's not so say I'm in favor of age verification, just pointing out the silver lining.

      5 replies →