← Back to context

Comment by vrganj

2 days ago

> Impossible to leave now when you joined 20+ years ago, when the EU was something completely different, which now grew beyond what you signed up for, without fucking your economy. It's called a rug pull with a dead man's switch. Try to leave and we make sure we all blow up.

The EU was always designed to be an "ever closer union". It's literally in the Treaty of Rome from 1957 (!). This is explicitly what was signed up for. It's going a bit slow, unfortunately, but it is the core point. There's no rug being pulled. This was always the goal. It is specifically what everyone signed on to.

>The EU was always designed to be an "ever closer union".

Wow, isn't it convenient that such a vague all-encompassing paper from the past that you never voted for, can be used a justification for anything being done to you today?

What are the boundaries for that "ever closer union"? At which point it it just close enough? Or is it open ended? Would you sign an open ended contract with the bank? That wouldn't be legal.

>It's literally in the Treaty of Rome from 1957 (!)

How many Europeans alive today voted for that in 1957? Were they aware when they signed it of what it would lead to or were they duped into signing something so vague and all-encompassing that will be used to do anything against them in the future?

>This is explicitly what was signed up for.

That's the problem, it's vague and not explicit at all.

> This was always the goal.

Really? In 1957 people back then already knew that in the future they would cede their national sovereignty to a unelected bureaucrat in Brussels who would make decisions against their nation's best interest?

>It is specifically what everyone signed on to.

Who exactly is that "everyone"? I never voted for this. Neither did my parents.

  • There's no boundaries to "ever closer union". That's what ever closer means, definitionally.

    Nobody was duped into anything, countries exercised their sovereignty to come to an agreement.

    The rest of your concerns is just how literally any legislation and treaty ever works. When did you sign on to your country's constitution? What about the treaty of Bern establishing the Universal Postal Union in 1874?

    Key concept here is legal succession.

    • >There's no boundaries to "ever closer union".

      Ok, but you haven't told me what exactly the end goal of that "ever closer union" is. Aren't we already fully unified?

      Nor have you disputed the vagueness of the "ever closer union" which is used to undemocratically bully countries in the union to do what unelected corrupt Brussels bureaucrats want them to do.

      >Key concept here is legal succession.

      Which is not set in stone.

      2 replies →