← Back to context

Comment by devindotcom

3 months ago

"It should be obvious that Daniel's private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad's values or mission."

Why do you think that quote supports your argument?

  • If we're going to sealion, why don't you first explain what you think my argument is and why the quote does not support it?

    • Accusation: "So you're a political company, but you don't want people to examine the politics of the people running the company? That seems naive."

      Supposed evidence: "It should be obvious that Daniel's private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad's values or mission."

      But the second quote has nothing to do with the accusation. He never said that he was against people examining the politics of the people running the company. Not even hinting at it.

      This hasn't anything to do with you, but I also notice that people are flagging and [dead]ing completely reasonable comments in this thread, making any kind of decent conversation quite hard. What is the point of being in a comment thread, if we figuratively "kill" every person who doesn't follow only one allowed view. Are hackers doing this because they are the same type of persons who would literally kill people with differing views if they had such opportunity and power?

      2 replies →

It should be obvious that it is utterly incompatible with the values and mission of Mullvad for a Mullvad executive to give a large amount money from Mullvad customers to advance public policy with the primary and direct intent to restrict freedom of expression.

  • > to advance public policy with the primary and direct intent to restrict freedom of expression.

    I'd love to see you proving this claim as I believe that's not what the party stands for.

  • I have yet to find any proof that this actually part of their political program. Can you elaborate on that?

    • Interesting how many similar questions were raised with barely any responses.

      Seems like there isn't a lot of substance around the nightmare deportation scenarios some seem to believe in.