Their co-founder (not just an employee) is bankrolling a party that’s leader has called for the expelling of all immigrants. This fact is not in dispute.
"I'm surprised the co-founder of a freedom of speech company is contributing to a political party that wants to force religious charter schools to close."
Their co-founder (not just an employee) is bankrolling a party that’s leader has called for the expelling of all immigrants. This fact is not in dispute.
That doesn't mean the behavior of the company is political in the same direction? Am I taking crazy pills?
You're surprised the co-founder of a privacy company is advocating that a countries membership should be ... private?
You're just playing with language. I can say:
"I'm surprised the co-founder of a freedom of speech company is contributing to a political party that wants to force religious charter schools to close."