← Back to context

Comment by jasonvorhe

3 months ago

Everyone has their own definition of a bad actor. The fact that you're implying to know how to spot them says a lot about your tolerance for differences in opinion.

6 comments

jasonvorhe

Reply
kgwxd  3 months ago

You would have been so much better off just ending on the, already obvious BS, part about how his views aren't the companies. Instead, you went on to downplay the obvious problem.

Mullvad was one of the last products I felt I could honestly recommend, and feel good about. Never falling for this garbage again. The world is complete shit right now.

  • kfreds  3 months ago

    I'm sorry to hear that. For what it's worth I think there's nuance in his decision that most people don't see. Of course that doesn't mean I think it was the right decision to make.

    Here's something worth considering: why would someone whose ideal is open borders, who has been an animal rights activist, and someone who has led Mullvad for 17 years (with the track record it has), choose to donate to this party? If you like what Daniel and I have done together over the past 17 years, and now vehemently oppose his choice to make this donation, doesn't that make you just a little bit curious?

    It made me curious. It didn't change my ultimate stance, but it did temper my emotions about it.

    • lightbritefight  3 months ago

      What are you inferring here? That your friend only makes moral choices, so this one should be judged through the same lense?

      What "moral choice" specifically was Daniel supporting?

      2 replies →