Comment by grey-area
1 day ago
If you understood the change, writing a short description of the problem and the fix yourself would be trivial.
1 day ago
If you understood the change, writing a short description of the problem and the fix yourself would be trivial.
Efficiency is the key. I haven’t written any issue before so LLM was much quicker than manual experiment. I have personally checked the result before submission.
So why the hate? :)
You "personally checked" the result (generated by an LLM, a huge black box with extensive knowledge of all fields) to the best of your knowledge. There is a mismatch between what the machine knows (and has done as the result of it) and what you think you know.
Implementing a fix implies knowledge of the inner workings that brought you to it. A fix made by a LLM does not give you that.
Why do I argue here anyway? :)
Before sending it I have tried the patch locally. It worked.
So I sent the proposal. And it was accepted by the author.
Efficiency rarely is the key.
> Efficiency is the key.
... and includes the reviewer efficiency disrespected by your verbose bot.