← Back to context

Comment by charcircuit

9 hours ago

That's copyright infringement. They do not have the rights to distribute the movies.

Neither does Sony (anymore), apparently. They still sold them.

  • and redefined the terms of "sold" in their contract to mean "rent, with a one-time fee"

    it is more immoral to sell something you can't legally "sell" (permanently and irrevocably transfer ownership of a product), than to pirate that content (which has no level of expected payment)

  • Sony sold them while they still had the license with a clause that they could remove them at any time.

    • Yep. That's the argument.

      People don't like that though. We should change the laws so that is illegal. We can just make laws we want--we're allowed to do that.

they don't host or distribute movies, they distribute torrents/magnets.. the speakeasy might be illegal, but telling people where to find one is not.

  • Let me just say, I fuckin love piracy, but it's more like a speakeasy that piped booze in from everyone's house into the bar instead of just keeping the bottles above the bar. Booze all the same though

    • I dislike the term "pirate" when used to describe unauthorized reproductions of a work. I prefer neutral terms like "archivist". Calling someone a pirate reduces the conversation to pejorative labeling, i.e. a dysphemism. When we turn a blind eye to that, or worse we embrace it, we lose the opportunity to have a balanced/adult discussion about what is and should be legal.

But you can actually purchase them at 100% discount. And you can own as long as you want. Seems a much better deal.