Comment by mthoms
5 days ago
We need to make an effort to distinguish “this is a thing for humans” vs “this is a thing for bots” in our naming IMHO. In that respect, “open wiki” is not such a great name. “Agent Wiki” or similar would be better.
Without such a qualifier, “wiki” carries a strong connotation of (usually collaborative) human involvement. That’s literally what it’s famous for.
Thats just my $0.02 on the naming. I definitely think it’s a worthwhile idea. All the best.
I recently noticed people think "wiki" is a set of deeply interlinked documents. But to me it means ability to edit without logging in.
I don't know of any wikis that let you edit without logging in. That is simply not viable, it'd be like trying to live without an immune system.
The original C2 wiki did that for two decades.
Wikipedia?
2 replies →